Would you speak out if you knew Her Majesty Revenue and Customs had misused thousands of pounds of public funds to charge you with being an extremist for heckling the British National Party at a peaceful protest in Burnley? Would you refuse to drop your case with the Civil Service Commissioners if you were warned by HMRC you would be sacked if you did not? If your wondering why I did then perhaps when you've read these internal letters, reports, and e-mails you’ll understand.
Monday, October 26, 2015
Monday, September 14, 2015
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Joanne Lewis, Higher Officer, Finance and Performance Team, Benefit and Credits awarded MBE despite being found guilty of making false sexual allegations in order to help HMRC find me guilty of being an extremist for heckling the BNP - Could not make it up.
A Civil Servant who was found guilty of making false sexual allegations was awarded an MBE in honors list....see here: http://www.taxjournal.com/tj/articles/people-and-firms-birthday-honours-hmrc-officials-27202
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Letter from Maureen White (Information Commissioners Office (ICO) quoting Section 50(2)(c) of the Freedom of Information Act to refuse a simple FOI request.
Letter from Maureen White from the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) stating that the ICO has upheld the Civil Service Commissioner (CSC) latest refusal not to release information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) (the ICO never does anything but find in favor of the CSC). What makes this decision so interesting, however, is that the ICO is quoting Section 50(2)(c) of the FOI to refuse this particular request - and when the ICO issues a refusal under section 50(2)(c) it also refuses to issue a Decision Notice. For those who wish to appeal to the Employment Rights Tribunal (EAT) this is bad news because without a Decision Notice the EAT will not accept an appeal. In effect the ICO is barring what should be an automatic right of a individual to appeal to the EAT.
It also does not record it as a statistic or publish its decision on the website, so nobody knows anything about it. But here is a copy of the letter they sent me informing me they were refusing my request under section 50(2)(c)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
I was told that saying you would like sugar in your tea to a female member of staff could be harassment (I kid you not) but when HMRC staff ...
-
This is an internal e-mail which proofs that I submitted complaints against Tony Smith and other members of staff prior to their complaints ...
-