Would you speak out if you knew Her Majesty Revenue and Customs had misused thousands of pounds of public funds to charge you with being an extremist for heckling the British National Party at a peaceful protest in Burnley? Would you refuse to drop your case with the Civil Service Commissioners if you were warned by HMRC you would be sacked if you did not? If your wondering why I did then perhaps when you've read these internal letters, reports, and e-mails you’ll understand.
Showing posts with label Her Majestys Revenue and Customs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Her Majestys Revenue and Customs. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Kath Doyle Her Majesty's Reveune and Customs witness statement after she had found Andi Ali guilty of holding 'extreme political views' for heckling the British National Party (BNP) at a peaceful protest in Burnley. The BNP being a neo nazi group which has sought to remove all non-whites from HMRC and Civil Service as a whole.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
BNPGATE - Public Information Disclouser Act 1998 & Civil Service Code
I have decided to write a book about the harassment,racism and bullying I was subjected to within Her Majesty's' Revenue and Customs (HMRC) because of my academic studies on the BNP, and after being put on a BNP hit list called Redwatch. I raise these concerns under the Public Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA) and Civil Service code.
Under the PDIA 1998 Civil Servants can make public disclosures, providing they do so in good faith, they genuwinely believe the disclousers are true, or they have a reasonable beleief that they are genwine, and they have tried to riase these concerns internally but to no avail. In the case of the first three provisons I have uploaded internal HMRC documents, letters and e-mails on to this site which proves that my concerns are genwine and HMRC are guility of missusing public funds to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP, and I did raise these concerns but to no avail. Indeed, one of the charges HMRC laid against me before I was sacked, was that I had raised concerns to the Civil Service Commissoners and the Police, under the Civil Service Code and PIDA, and that was a fundemental breach of contract.
Under the PIDA employees cannot seek personel gain either finincally or otherwise by raising concerns under PIDA and neither do I seek any. I simply raise these concerns in my BOOK BNPGATE to hilight abuses of the Civil Service Code within HMRC because it was my duty to do so.
BNPGATE will be published on here and other internet websites as soon as they have been written, begining with the introduction above.
Under the PDIA 1998 Civil Servants can make public disclosures, providing they do so in good faith, they genuwinely believe the disclousers are true, or they have a reasonable beleief that they are genwine, and they have tried to riase these concerns internally but to no avail. In the case of the first three provisons I have uploaded internal HMRC documents, letters and e-mails on to this site which proves that my concerns are genwine and HMRC are guility of missusing public funds to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP, and I did raise these concerns but to no avail. Indeed, one of the charges HMRC laid against me before I was sacked, was that I had raised concerns to the Civil Service Commissoners and the Police, under the Civil Service Code and PIDA, and that was a fundemental breach of contract.
Under the PIDA employees cannot seek personel gain either finincally or otherwise by raising concerns under PIDA and neither do I seek any. I simply raise these concerns in my BOOK BNPGATE to hilight abuses of the Civil Service Code within HMRC because it was my duty to do so.
BNPGATE will be published on here and other internet websites as soon as they have been written, begining with the introduction above.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Chapter 20 of the Guide which deals with racial harrassment within the Civil Service including HMRC.

As you can see Chapter 20.2 of the Guide which deals with issues such as racial harassment states, any form of unjustified discrimination (whether direct or indirect)which contravenes our policy and is unacceptable and no one must suffer any form of harassment from their colleagues. We I was subjected to racial harassment, it wasn't justified, harassment never is, and this is why the case is before the Civil Service Commissioners and I won't let it drop.
. As you can see chapter 20:2 of the guide, Chapter 20.63 of the Guide which deals with issues such as racial harassment. As you can see the guide states that you (as a Civil Servant) must challenge issues which are against Civil Service values. states that you (as a Civil Servant) must challenge issues which are against Civil Service values.
As you can see chapter 20.63 of the Guide states that you (as a Civil Servant) must challenge issues which are against Civil Service values. Making false allegations against somebody, bullying, claiming somebody is expressing support for suicide bombers because they are waring an Arabic headscarf, and miss using public funds and charging somebody with being an extremist for heckling the BNP, is deffently against those principles.
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Have E-mailed the Scotish National Party informing them that HMRC expressed the view Alex Salmond Scotish National Party should be shot.

Remember I have a duty under the Civil Service Code to report such abuses, and I will not fail in my duty.

Here is a copy of part the Civil Service Code. See section 13 Political Impartially. For example you must not allow your personel political views to determine any advice you give or your actions. What is Houghton doing, when he said Alex Salmond Scotish National Party should be shot, if he is not allowing his personel political views to determine his actions?
HMRC's own CCTV cameras proved I was telling the truth and HMRC were lying. Click on the screen and see more.
If what Kirk Houghton said about me was true than I would have been seen going into the Building by HMRC's cctv cameras. When HMRC were asked to produce them they could not. This is what they said.

HMRC are a law enforcement agency. Are we really to believe they would not have examined the CCTV immediately instead of waiting months as they claim? The real reason they did not want to produce the tapes is they proved I was telling the truth and others in HMRC were lying.

HMRC are a law enforcement agency. Are we really to believe they would not have examined the CCTV immediately instead of waiting months as they claim? The real reason they did not want to produce the tapes is they proved I was telling the truth and others in HMRC were lying.
An internal HMRC e-mail shows Civil Servant expressing view that Alex Salmond Scotish National Party should be shot.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
-
-
This is an internal e-mail which proofs that I submitted complaints against Tony Smith and other members of staff prior to their complaints ...























