Wednesday, August 25, 2010
As we enter a new decade once again through the undergrowth, battle lines are being drawn. On one side, bigotry, racism and the uneducated. On the other the voices of reason, peace and equality. (Andi Ali: August, 2010).
I think ther fact that Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs convicted me of being an extremist for heckling the BNP at a peaceful protest, shows how extremists groups like the BNP are becoming ever more popular amongst British society.....sad as it may be.
BNPGATE: The true story of how and why Her Majestys Revenue and Customs charged Andi Ali with being an extremist for heckling the BNP.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
E-mail to Dave Hartnett complaining of racial harassment within Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs after Dave Hartnett tells BBC that HMRC operates 'zero tolerance' to racial harassment and all cases will be looked into. Now lets see what Dave Hartnett does about this.
 |
| And above is the PROOF he has read the e-mail. |
 |
| Above is the e-mail: |
Click the below link to show BBC report of racism within Her Majesty's Reveune and Customs. What is interesting to note here are comments that 'it was a shock to find the extent of racism within Her Majestys' Revenue and Customs'. It was not. As the internal reports, letters and e-mails from this blog shows, racism is epidemic within the department and HMRC are trying to cover up an even bigger case of racism within it's ranks. One that involves misussing public money and the Neo Nazi BNP.
Ex TUV candidate Ann Cooper voices support for those sacked for racial hassment at HMRC in Belfast "Well done lads. Sorry you got caught. You deserve a medal. We need more like you."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-11024077
These Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs employees may not have got away with racial harassment at Belfast, but there are plenty at HMRC in Preston who did, like Phil Davies, like Nick Ivell, Tony Smith, and others who falsely accused me of expressing support for suicide bombers, such as Anthony Stansfield....... why are these bigots not being charged with racial harassment? Perhaps Mrs Cooper will take conforst in knowing that there are more like them found guilty of racism in HMRC and unlike them in Belfast....they have so far got away with it.....I say so far.......
These Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs employees may not have got away with racial harassment at Belfast, but there are plenty at HMRC in Preston who did, like Phil Davies, like Nick Ivell, Tony Smith, and others who falsely accused me of expressing support for suicide bombers, such as Anthony Stansfield....... why are these bigots not being charged with racial harassment? Perhaps Mrs Cooper will take conforst in knowing that there are more like them found guilty of racism in HMRC and unlike them in Belfast....they have so far got away with it.....I say so far.......
Friday, August 20, 2010
Dave Hartnett, senior manger in Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, likely to testify to Civil Service Commissioners that HMRC did charge Andi Ali with being an extremist for heckling the Neo Nazi BNP at a peaceful protest in Bunrley, and HMRC staff did falsely accuse Andi Ali of expressing support for suicide bombers because he wore an Arabic headscarf - which was Racial Harassment.
Dave Hartnett, permanent secretary for tax at HMRC, said "the department operated a zero-tolerance policy on racial discrimination". Hartnett has been cited as a key witness in HMRC 's charged that Andi Ali was an extremist for heckling the BNP, and that when Andi Ali wore an Arabic headscarf, he simply did so to show support for suicide bombers. Mr Hartnett will be asked TO EXPLAIN how that equates with his claim that "the department operated a zero-tolerance policy on racial discrimination"?
Part One of Andi Ali's submission to Bill Brooke Civil Service Commissioners Office regarding Racial Harassment, Victimisation and Discrimination he was subjected to within HMRC, as well as Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) misusing public money to charge him with being an extremist for heckling the Neo Nazi BNP
Submission of case before Civil Service Commissioners
1) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged me (and found me guilty) of being an extremist for heckling the British National Party (BNP), at a peaceful protest in Burnley, (after my details had been put on a BNP hit list called Redwatch), they breached section 13 of the Civil Service Code which covers Political Impartiality.
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) allow their personal political views to determine advice they gave, for example, HMRC solicitors and mangers should not have misused public funds to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP, and only did so, because it was their personal view that heckling the BNP made me an extremist.
(B) acted in a way that was determined by party political considerations,
(C) used official resources for party political purposes,
(E) allowed their political belifs to determined their actions.
(2) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged me of expressing support for suicide bombers, sexual harassment and bullying, and then admitted the allegations were false, they breached section 2 of the Civil Service Code which covers its core values of integrity, honesty, objectivity and impartiality.
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) failed to uphold their obligations and put their own personal interests above that of the public service;
(B) failed to uphold it core values of integrity, objectivity and impartiality,
(C) failed to act impartially in deciding the merits of the case,
(D) failed to be objective and base their advice and decisions on a rigious analysis of the evidence.
For example, HMRC investigators switched off tapes during interviews and against recognised procedures, and encouraged staff to submit false allegations of sexual harassment against me. That was not being objective and that was not basing their advice and decisions on a rigorous analysis of the evidence. Quite the opposite.
(3) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged me falsely of expressing support for suicide bombers, sexual harassment, bullying, and being an extremist for heckling the BNP, they breached section 5 of the Civil Service Code which deals with integrity:
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) failed to act a way that was professional and that deserves and retains the confidence of all those with whom they had dealings;
(B) failed to make sure that public money was used properly and efficiently. (For example, using public money to charge and convict me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP outside of work, was hardly using public money properly and efficiently);
(C) failed to comply with the law and uphold the the administration of justice. (For example, making false sexual allegations against me on more than one occasion, was an offence under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and accusing me of expressing support for suicide bombers, was 'Racial Harrassment' which is a criminal offence under the law.
(4) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged me falsely of expressing support for suicide bombers, sexual harassment, bullying, and being an extremist for heckling the BNP, they breached section 7 of the Civil Service Code which deals with honesty:
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) Failed to set out the facts and relevant issues truthfully, and correct any errors as soon as possible; and,
(B) failed to use resources only for the authorised public purposes for which they were provided,
(5) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) told my Member of Parliament that they had not charged me with expressing support for sucide bombers, sexual harassment, bullying, and being an extremist for heckling the BNP, and/or all investigations would be conducted fairly and in accordance with the rules, they breached section 8 of the Civil Service Code which deals with honesty:
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) actions were influenced by the prospect of personal gain, such as promotion
(D) were influenced by improper pressures from other,
(C) deceived and knowling deceived Members of Parliament.
There are other breaches of the Code, but following our discussion on the telephone, two weeks ago, you asked me to put only a few of them in writing so you can beinn an investigation.
Further, when HMRC sacked me after Neil Richardson, and senior manger within HMRC sent me a letter saying, I had breached my contract for amongst things, raising concerns of inappropriate behaviour within HMRC under the Civil Service Code and Public Information Disclosure Act (1998), this was a breach of the code and of the PIDA, which make it unlawful to dismiss staff for raising concerns. Further, what happened at HMRC was unlawful and I am pursing this as a criminal matter.
Finally, one Civil Servant has implied that Civil Servants who commit criminal acts are covered under the Official Secrets Act. I do not take that view. I take the view that Civil Servants who engage in criminal behaviour, such as racial harassment, are bound by the same laws as everybody else. I also stand by my view that there is nothing extremist in heckling the BNP at a peaceful protest. The BNP are a nasty racist party, whose views should have no place in the Civil Service.
Andi Ali
15/08/2010.
1) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged me (and found me guilty) of being an extremist for heckling the British National Party (BNP), at a peaceful protest in Burnley, (after my details had been put on a BNP hit list called Redwatch), they breached section 13 of the Civil Service Code which covers Political Impartiality.
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) allow their personal political views to determine advice they gave, for example, HMRC solicitors and mangers should not have misused public funds to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP, and only did so, because it was their personal view that heckling the BNP made me an extremist.
(B) acted in a way that was determined by party political considerations,
(C) used official resources for party political purposes,
(E) allowed their political belifs to determined their actions.
(2) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged me of expressing support for suicide bombers, sexual harassment and bullying, and then admitted the allegations were false, they breached section 2 of the Civil Service Code which covers its core values of integrity, honesty, objectivity and impartiality.
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) failed to uphold their obligations and put their own personal interests above that of the public service;
(B) failed to uphold it core values of integrity, objectivity and impartiality,
(C) failed to act impartially in deciding the merits of the case,
(D) failed to be objective and base their advice and decisions on a rigious analysis of the evidence.
For example, HMRC investigators switched off tapes during interviews and against recognised procedures, and encouraged staff to submit false allegations of sexual harassment against me. That was not being objective and that was not basing their advice and decisions on a rigorous analysis of the evidence. Quite the opposite.
(3) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged me falsely of expressing support for suicide bombers, sexual harassment, bullying, and being an extremist for heckling the BNP, they breached section 5 of the Civil Service Code which deals with integrity:
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) failed to act a way that was professional and that deserves and retains the confidence of all those with whom they had dealings;
(B) failed to make sure that public money was used properly and efficiently. (For example, using public money to charge and convict me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP outside of work, was hardly using public money properly and efficiently);
(C) failed to comply with the law and uphold the the administration of justice. (For example, making false sexual allegations against me on more than one occasion, was an offence under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and accusing me of expressing support for suicide bombers, was 'Racial Harrassment' which is a criminal offence under the law.
(4) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged me falsely of expressing support for suicide bombers, sexual harassment, bullying, and being an extremist for heckling the BNP, they breached section 7 of the Civil Service Code which deals with honesty:
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) Failed to set out the facts and relevant issues truthfully, and correct any errors as soon as possible; and,
(B) failed to use resources only for the authorised public purposes for which they were provided,
(5) When Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) told my Member of Parliament that they had not charged me with expressing support for sucide bombers, sexual harassment, bullying, and being an extremist for heckling the BNP, and/or all investigations would be conducted fairly and in accordance with the rules, they breached section 8 of the Civil Service Code which deals with honesty:
This is because Civil Servants:
(A) actions were influenced by the prospect of personal gain, such as promotion
(D) were influenced by improper pressures from other,
(C) deceived and knowling deceived Members of Parliament.
There are other breaches of the Code, but following our discussion on the telephone, two weeks ago, you asked me to put only a few of them in writing so you can beinn an investigation.
Further, when HMRC sacked me after Neil Richardson, and senior manger within HMRC sent me a letter saying, I had breached my contract for amongst things, raising concerns of inappropriate behaviour within HMRC under the Civil Service Code and Public Information Disclosure Act (1998), this was a breach of the code and of the PIDA, which make it unlawful to dismiss staff for raising concerns. Further, what happened at HMRC was unlawful and I am pursing this as a criminal matter.
Finally, one Civil Servant has implied that Civil Servants who commit criminal acts are covered under the Official Secrets Act. I do not take that view. I take the view that Civil Servants who engage in criminal behaviour, such as racial harassment, are bound by the same laws as everybody else. I also stand by my view that there is nothing extremist in heckling the BNP at a peaceful protest. The BNP are a nasty racist party, whose views should have no place in the Civil Service.
Andi Ali
15/08/2010.
Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs staff found guilty of racial abuse. See here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-11011034 I'm delighted action has been taken. However, racism is endemic within HMRC and the internal HMRC documents, e-mails and reports on here prove it. An investigation in to these matters must be conducted by the Police and Crown Prosecution Service without any further delay.
Three points to note about what happened at HMRC in Belfast though.
1) When HMRC upheld Tony Smith's complaint that I was an extremist for heckling the BNP - that complaint was upheld by Tina Gallagher - Director of HMRC in Belfast.... the very same place were HMRC staff have been found guilty of race discrimination. (If the Director of Revenue and Customs thinks you are an extremist for heckling the BNP at a peaceful protest, then clearly it does not bode well for race relations at HMRC in Belfast). The BNP are after all, a Neo Nazi Party who have advocated the to removal all non whites and Jews from Britain.
2) Dave Hartnett, permanent secretary for tax at HMRC, said "the department operates a zero-tolerance policy on racial discrimination". I'm delighted to hear it, as when HMRC sacked me it was after I had been accused of breaching my contract for raising concerns of inappropriate behaviour under the Public Information Disclosure Act 1998 to the said Dave Hartnett.
3) If the department operates a zero-tolerance policy on racial discrimination as Hartnett claims, then why has HMRC not action been taken against staff and managers who racially harassed me? For example,
(A) Why has Nick Ivell, Tim Fisher, Tony Smith not been dismissed for falsely accusing me of expressing support for 'sucide bombers'?
(B) Why has Joanne Lewis, Scott Turner and Anthony Stansfield not been dismissed for falsely accusing me of sexual harassment, as Neo Nazis had been doing prior to this, because of my academic studies on the BNP.
(C) Why has nobody in HMRC been dismissed for misusing public money to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP at a peaceful protest in Burnley?
1) When HMRC upheld Tony Smith's complaint that I was an extremist for heckling the BNP - that complaint was upheld by Tina Gallagher - Director of HMRC in Belfast.... the very same place were HMRC staff have been found guilty of race discrimination. (If the Director of Revenue and Customs thinks you are an extremist for heckling the BNP at a peaceful protest, then clearly it does not bode well for race relations at HMRC in Belfast). The BNP are after all, a Neo Nazi Party who have advocated the to removal all non whites and Jews from Britain.
2) Dave Hartnett, permanent secretary for tax at HMRC, said "the department operates a zero-tolerance policy on racial discrimination". I'm delighted to hear it, as when HMRC sacked me it was after I had been accused of breaching my contract for raising concerns of inappropriate behaviour under the Public Information Disclosure Act 1998 to the said Dave Hartnett.
3) If the department operates a zero-tolerance policy on racial discrimination as Hartnett claims, then why has HMRC not action been taken against staff and managers who racially harassed me? For example,
(A) Why has Nick Ivell, Tim Fisher, Tony Smith not been dismissed for falsely accusing me of expressing support for 'sucide bombers'?
(B) Why has Joanne Lewis, Scott Turner and Anthony Stansfield not been dismissed for falsely accusing me of sexual harassment, as Neo Nazis had been doing prior to this, because of my academic studies on the BNP.
(C) Why has nobody in HMRC been dismissed for misusing public money to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP at a peaceful protest in Burnley?
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Wendy Outhwaite QC - One Crown Office Row - is likely to testify to the Police that Her Majestys Revenue and Customs charged Andi Ali with being an extremist for heckling the BNP.
If true, Andi is very grateful that such an eminent barrister would step forward and do this on his behalf.
Monday, August 2, 2010
You can order my autobiography Dead Paki Walking :A Study of the BNP by going here http://www.amazon.com/Dead-Paki-Walking-Study-ebook/dp/B003YUCPZG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&m=A7B2F8DUJ88VZ&s=digital-text&qid=1281735982&sr=8-2
During his investigations into the British National Party (BNP), academic researcher Andi Ali has come face-to-face with the brutal reality of racism in the UK. Threatened as a 'Dead Paki Walking' Ali has been beaten, stabbed and even abducted, and is included on the Neo-Nazi Redwatch hit-list. Ali s academic research in to the BNP has made him powerful enemies who have warned him to stop his activities. When he refused he was viciously assaulted outside Downing Street and left for dead. In Dead Paki Walking, Ali explains how his investigations started and of the means members of the far-right have taken to smear his name in order to stop his activities. As an autobiography, Dead Paki Walking is written in the first person and reads like a dark and sinister political thriller. The frightening fact is that the BNP are attracting an increasing number of supporters. If nothing else, Andi's book epitomizes the maxim 'know thine enemy'. This disturbing autobiography is a tale of one man's battle against racial intolerance, which Ali has fought everyday to uphold the liberal values in which he believes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
This is an internal e-mail which proofs that I submitted complaints against Tony Smith and other members of staff prior to their complaints ...
