Would you speak out if you knew Her Majesty Revenue and Customs had misused thousands of pounds of public funds to charge you with being an extremist for heckling the British National Party at a peaceful protest in Burnley? Would you refuse to drop your case with the Civil Service Commissioners if you were warned by HMRC you would be sacked if you did not? If your wondering why I did then perhaps when you've read these internal letters, reports, and e-mails you’ll understand.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Have now sent proof HMRC charged me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP to the Commissioners.
If they fail to act - I will take it to the press. It's not a case of when this matter is investigated, its only a case of when. God - I'm looking forward to the New Year.
Sunday, December 20, 2009
The Civil Service Commissioners, HMRC and the onging BNP case
Spoken to Bill Brooke from the Civil Service Commissioners a couple of days back. He has asked me to provide a full account of the complaints I have raised to the Commissioners which I said I would do - even though I raised these concerns two years ago, so the Commissioners really have no excuss for not taking action before. However, because providing a full account is going to take some time I have asked, and the Commissioners have agreed to this, to provide the first part by Febuary 20 2010. This relates to the matter concerning the BNP and how Her Majestrys Revenue and Customs came to use public money to charge me with, and find me guility of being an extremist for heckling the BNP. Under the Civil Service Code I have a duty to ensure that public money and other resources are used properly and efficiently, and the fact that HMRC used public money to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP is clearly a breach of the code.
There are a lot more breaches of the code I have, and are bringing to the attention of the Commissioners - but they want a summary of the BNP case first.
There are a lot more breaches of the code I have, and are bringing to the attention of the Commissioners - but they want a summary of the BNP case first.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
E-mails from Lancashire Police requesting more information
Received an e-mail from Lancashire Police a few days ago. They are still up to their old tricks. Refusing to take a statement but keep on asking for more and more information in the hope it wear me out and I will give up. What does it take to get the Police to take a statement? Why do the Police and Civil Service think Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs are above the law? Racial harassment is wrong and should never be tolerated - but clearly that's not the view of others. Have sent documents to the police. Penny to a pound they will ask for something else and still refuse to take a statement.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Janet Paraskeva, Civil Service Commissioners did not tell the House of Commons about how HMRC charging me with being extremist for heckling the BNP
when Janet Paraskeva from the Civil Service Commissioners give evidence before the House of Commons about whistleblowing in the Civil Service she of course did not mention my case before the commissioners, and how the Civil Service used thousands of pounds of tax payers money to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP at a peaceful protest in Burnley.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
I was told that saying you would like sugar in your tea to a female member of staff could be harassment (I kid you not) but when HMRC staff ...
-
This is an internal e-mail which proofs that I submitted complaints against Tony Smith and other members of staff prior to their complaints ...
-