Spoken to Bill Brooke from the Civil Service Commissioners a couple of days back. He has asked me to provide a full account of the complaints I have raised to the Commissioners which I said I would do - even though I raised these concerns two years ago, so the Commissioners really have no excuss for not taking action before. However, because providing a full account is going to take some time I have asked, and the Commissioners have agreed to this, to provide the first part by Febuary 20 2010. This relates to the matter concerning the BNP and how Her Majestrys Revenue and Customs came to use public money to charge me with, and find me guility of being an extremist for heckling the BNP. Under the Civil Service Code I have a duty to ensure that public money and other resources are used properly and efficiently, and the fact that HMRC used public money to charge me with being an extremist for heckling the BNP is clearly a breach of the code.
There are a lot more breaches of the code I have, and are bringing to the attention of the Commissioners - but they want a summary of the BNP case first.
Would you speak out if you knew Her Majesty Revenue and Customs had misused thousands of pounds of public funds to charge you with being an extremist for heckling the British National Party at a peaceful protest in Burnley? Would you refuse to drop your case with the Civil Service Commissioners if you were warned by HMRC you would be sacked if you did not? If your wondering why I did then perhaps when you've read these internal letters, reports, and e-mails you’ll understand.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I was told that saying you would like sugar in your tea to a female member of staff could be harassment (I kid you not) but when HMRC staff ...
-
This is an internal e-mail which proofs that I submitted complaints against Tony Smith and other members of staff prior to their complaints ...
-
No comments:
Post a Comment