In section 1.4 of the report HMRC investigators State:
On the second occasion in an email of 3 April AA intimated that he intended to complain that IW is not proposing to interview all the witnesses put forward by him (at total of in excess of 100 people).
In another section 5.H.5 of the same report they say:
Our analysis shows that AA suggested 5 witnesses, of whom 3 were interviewed.
Would you speak out if you knew Her Majesty Revenue and Customs had misused thousands of pounds of public funds to charge you with being an extremist for heckling the British National Party at a peaceful protest in Burnley? Would you refuse to drop your case with the Civil Service Commissioners if you were warned by HMRC you would be sacked if you did not? If your wondering why I did then perhaps when you've read these internal letters, reports, and e-mails you’ll understand.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I was told that saying you would like sugar in your tea to a female member of staff could be harassment (I kid you not) but when HMRC staff ...
-
This is an internal e-mail which proofs that I submitted complaints against Tony Smith and other members of staff prior to their complaints ...
-
1 comment:
You have got guts Mr Ali I will grant you that.
Post a Comment